Right out of the theater and both hyped up and disturbed by this important film. A great work of investigative journalism, Cold Case Hammarskjiöld is a must-see for everyone to see the dark history of the genocide of Africans by the American and British intelligence services.
Shown as part of the Wisconsin Film Festival, the film starts with a black-and-white animation showing a plane being blown up in the sky. Soon, we find out the plane belonged to Dag Hammarskjiöld, the second secretary general of the United Nations. Mads Brügger adopts a combination of animation, photos, and live-action to make a breathtaking thriller, an engaging whodunit to find who murdered Hammarskjiöld. The animations work as reenactment and the photos are used to provide documents. The past live-action part shows some films of Hammarskjiöld, and the present live-action part is comprised of Brügger dictating the script to two African women, who are his secretaries for this project, as well as a lot of interviews.
While the first half moves forward slowly, the second half moves so fast that it would be hard for you to just sit back and watch the film. In the middle of the film, Brügger seems defeated and unable to solve the puzzle due to all the hidden information and almost no cooperation by anyone. However, suddenly the films takes a sudden turn and new pieces of evidence get revealed one by one to disclose one of the darkest moments of humanity’s history: the plan by white supremacists, led by the American and British intelligence services, to eradicate all Africans from the face of the Earth.
Given the confidentiality of most of the documents out there and the lack of cooperation by the institutions involved, the film heavily relies on the individual witnesses as well as some of the documents leaked out by former members of South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAIMR), the institution based in South Africa and Mozambique to follow to that mission. As a result, some people would still like to call it a conspiracy theory; however, if one goes with an open mind, I believe the film does a good job of providing a convincing collection of information. Besides, much of the information, like infecting African with AIDS, is not really news.
Brügger adopts a complicated persona throughout the film. He dresses as Keith Maxwell, the founder of SAIMR, sits down on a couch and dictates to African women what to write, a simple reenactment of white supremacy. But then when he goes out to interview people who are informed about this matter, he dresses differently and adopts an investigative journalist persona. It’s a simple hint by him to remind the viewer that the exploitation of Africans by White people does not belong only to the past but it’s an ongoing matter.
The film will make people uncomfortable; uncomfortable by throwing a dark truth to their face, and that needs a big standing ovation. Hope it gets wider distribution, especially in universities and community centers, because I think many theaters will not take the risk to show it and the film needs to create discussions and not just for the viewer to see it and move on. At the same time, I do hope theaters will grant it exhibition, even if they only care about profit.